| From: | Hartmut Holzgraefe <hartmut(dot)holzgraefe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |
| Date: | 2018-05-02 14:48:39 |
| Message-ID: | 01ad1630-ebfe-c63f-5de1-57a85cf99328@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02.05.2018 16:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> (-D? really?)
it's worse ... "cmake -L" only produces a alphabetically sorted list
of known -D settings, just listing the names without description.
That's so far behind from what
./configure --help
produces.
(And don't get me started on cmake-gui. One day I may even eventually
complete my "autotools-gui" ... https://github.com/hholzgra/autogui )
But at least on most Linux distributions TAB completion now works for
CMake -D options these days ...
--
hartmut
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-05-02 14:52:50 | Re: lingering references to V0 calling convention |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-05-02 14:42:27 | Re: power() function in Windows: "value out of range: underflow" |