| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Change pfree to accept NULL argument |
| Date: | 2022-08-28 08:00:34 |
| Message-ID: | 0c2d9164-a0ac-1a14-c837-110d05219e3a@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22.08.22 20:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not very convinced that the benefits of making pfree() more
> like free() are worth those costs.
>
> We could ameliorate the first objection if we wanted to back-patch
> 0002, I guess.
>
> (FWIW, no objection to your 0001. 0004 and 0005 seem okay too;
> they don't touch enough places to create much back-patching risk.)
To conclude this, I have committed those secondary patches and updated
the utils/mmgr/README with some information from this discussion.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2022-08-28 11:04:21 | Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-08-28 07:23:08 | Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support |