| From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curtis Faith <curtis(at)galtair(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Pgsql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes |
| Date: | 2002-10-06 23:35:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1033947313.14317.42.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg토토 커뮤니티SQL |
On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 18:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> CPU loading goes from 80% idle at 1 client to 50% idle at 5 clients
> to <10% idle at 10 or more.
>
> So this does seem to be a nice win, and unless I hear objections
> I will apply it ...
>
Wow Tom! That's wonderful! On the other hand, maybe people needed the
extra idle CPU time that was provided by the unpatched code. ;)
Greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-10-07 00:59:45 | Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-06 23:07:30 | Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes |