| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one |
| Date: | 2003-02-19 02:59:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1045623599.582.202.camel@tokyo |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 21:43, mlw wrote:
> This patch enables PostgreSQL to be far more flexible in
> its configuration methodology.
Without weighing in on the configuration debate, one thing this patch
definitely needs to do is update the documentation.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2003-02-19 03:19:57 | Re: Hard problem with concurrency |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-02-19 02:55:09 | Re: location of the configuration files |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-02-19 03:12:15 | Re: improve docs on min()/max() performance |
| Previous Message | mlw | 2003-02-19 02:43:10 | The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one does it all. |