| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | ntufar(at)pisem(dot)net, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PITR Dead horse? |
| Date: | 2004-02-05 14:12:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1075990378.308.410.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Don't know. But apparently different users will have
> > different demands From a database.
>
> Of course, but I would argue that my claim that PostgreSQL is reliable
> is backed up by the lack of people posting messages like 'we had a
> powercut and now my DB is hosed'.
One thing we could use (and I have no idea how to do it) is a "This
hardware is not appropriate for a database" test kit.
Something to detect lying disks, battery backed write cache that isn't
so battery backed, etc.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt [at] rbt [dot] ca>
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-02-05 14:34:33 | Re: [PATCHES] log session end - again |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-02-05 14:05:53 | Vacuum Delay feature |