| From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alex J(dot) Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Very large scale postgres support |
| Date: | 2004-02-09 02:20:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1076293206.48991.124.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg토토 꽁 머니SQL |
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 21:01, Alex J. Avriette wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:01:38PM -0500, Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > Replication won't help if those are all mostly write transactions. If a
> > small percentage, even 1% would be challenging, is INSERTS, UPDATES or
> > DELETES, master / slave replication might get you somewhere.
>
> There is no way on earth we could be doing writes at that rate. I think
> that's a given.
Sure you can, if you can horizontally partition the data so clients A
are on machine A, clients B are on machine B, ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-09 02:34:15 | Re: RFC: Security documentation |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-02-09 02:17:48 | Re: RFC: Very large scale postgres support |