| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fork/exec |
| Date: | 2003-11-28 21:04:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1106.1070053479@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The random seed value is unique per-backend, and we want to keep it
> secure so we can't pass it on the command line. I am not sure how to
> deal with that.
Uh, you mean the cancel key? There's no need for the random() seed per
se to be shared between postmaster and backend, AFAICS.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-28 21:24:22 | Re: fork/exec |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-28 19:50:00 | Re: fork/exec |