From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | "Pollard, Mike" <mpollard(at)cincom(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: generalizing the planner knobs |
Date: | 2005-12-02 15:20:07 |
Message-ID: | 1133536807.12218.168.camel@home |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> In the extreme, no amount of added intelligence in the optimizer is going to
> help it come up with any sane selectivity estimate for something like
>
> WHERE radius_authenticate(user) = 'OK'
Why not?
The missing capability in this case is to be able to provide or generate
(self learning?) statistics for a function that describe a typical
result and the cost of getting that result.
--
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-12-02 15:30:10 | Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK |
Previous Message | Cristian Prieto | 2005-12-02 15:12:15 | Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK |