| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: show all; |
| Date: | 2001-06-02 14:39:39 |
| Message-ID: | 11686.991492779@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The problem is that they don't want to change the log levels.
Why not? They want to suppress a notice that is perfectly reasonable
*in some contexts*. They just don't happen to want it in this context.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-06-02 14:49:11 | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-02 14:36:10 | Re: show all; |