| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Darren Johnson'" <djohnson(at)greatbridge(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | AW: Postgres Replication |
| Date: | 2001-06-12 07:02:20 |
| Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA68796336831B@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Although
> Postgres-R is a synchronous approach, I believe it is the closest to
> the goal mentioned above. Here is an abstract of the advantages.
If you only want synchronous replication, why not simply use triggers ?
All you would then need is remote query access and two phase commit,
and maybe a little script that helps create the appropriate triggers.
Doing a replicate all or nothing approach that only works synchronous
is imho not flexible enough.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | root | 2001-06-12 07:06:23 | Re: AW: Postgres Replication |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-12 06:55:23 | Re: Australian timezone configure option |