| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: idle connection timeout ... |
| Date: | 2002-10-25 20:43:41 |
| Message-ID: | 12220.1035578621@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 16:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I prefer GUC variables to table entries for setting stuff like recursion
>> limits; they're much lighter-weight to create and access, and you don't
>> need an initdb to add or remove a parameter.
> I don't see an adequate way to store the individual settings as GUC
> variables per user...
Have you looked at the per-database and per-user GUC facilities in 7.3?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-25 21:06:39 | Re: Time for RC1 soon? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2002-10-25 20:32:58 | Re: idle connection timeout ... |