| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion |
| Date: | 2009-12-08 02:23:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1260239004.25892.42.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 23:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Perhaps
> table_exclusion = {on, off, partition}
Sounds good to me.
> Of course, constraint_exclusion should continue to work as a synonym for
> backwards compatibility, but it wouldn't be documented.
+1.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-12-08 02:25:44 | Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-12-08 02:12:01 | Re: Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion |