| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hiroyuki Yamada <yamada(at)kokolink(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Standby and prepared transactions |
| Date: | 2009-12-17 13:05:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1261055113.634.3161.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 13:24 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Hmm, looking at the code, I think Simon threw that baby with the
> bathwater when he removed support for starting standby from a shutdown
> checkpoint.
Hmm, I think that code was just for starting points only. It would not
have been executed in normal running of the standby, so it appears the
bug was older than that. Absence of baby now appears inconclusive.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-12-17 13:07:28 | Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-12-17 13:00:55 | Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O |