| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: master in standby mode croaks |
| Date: | 2010-04-14 08:21:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1271233273.8305.1037.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 09:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> So this can fail in either of two ways
If I understand this correctly, it is unconvincing as a failure mode
since it doesn't follow any of the documented procedures for creating a
standby. There are many ways to screw up that ignore the manual, which
is why the manual exists.
If you can show a full test case, with failure, then I'll follow it
through.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-04-14 08:24:45 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-14 08:02:18 | Re: walreceiver is uninterruptible on win32 |