| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby |
| Date: | 2010-05-01 15:16:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1272727007.4161.23413.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg토토SQL : Postg토토SQL |
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server
That's part of the procedure already.
We need something better for the future, though not sure if there's any
small tweaks worth making for 9.0 right now. Let's start making wider
plans for next release.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-01 15:42:14 | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-05-01 14:05:53 | Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby |