| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to pass around collation information |
| Date: | 2010-06-03 07:43:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1275550986.17735.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2010-06-02 at 16:56 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> But in the end the only purpose of setting it on a column is to set
> which one will be used for operations on that column. And the user
> might still override it for a particular query.
Of course. I'm just saying that it *can* be useful to attach a
collation to a column definition, rather than only allowing it to be
specified along with the sort operation.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-06-03 07:56:54 | Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-06-03 07:37:10 | Re: Server crash while trying to read expression using pg_get_expr() |