| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Preferred way to define 64-bit constants? |
| Date: | 2012-06-24 18:34:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1340562878.13589.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2012-06-24 at 20:23 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I just committed the patch to change XLogRecPtr into a 64-bit constant,
> and I did this in the patch:
>
> #define XLogSegmentsPerXLogId (0x100000000LL / XLOG_SEG_SIZE)
>
> But I started to wonder, is that LL representation the preferred way to
> define 64-bit integer constants? I thought it is, but now that I grep
> around, I don't see any constants like that in the source tree.
See INT64CONST, UINT64CONST.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-06-24 18:40:51 | warning handling in Perl scripts |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-06-24 18:34:29 | Re: WAL format changes |