| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Posix Shared Mem patch |
| Date: | 2012-06-26 20:29:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1340742507-sup-5305@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
> Robert, all:
>
> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition. Is there anything
> keeping this from going into 9.3? It would eliminate a major
> configuration headache for our users.
I don't think that patch was all that reasonable. It needed work, and
in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-06-26 20:36:15 | Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-26 20:08:48 | Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed |