| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree |
| Date: | 2012-08-19 20:51:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1345409502.20987.20.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg윈 토토SQL : |
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 17:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> which would come
> back to bite us if we ever try to support index-only scans with SPGiST.
I'm confused:
And the patch that was just committed for Range Types SP-GiST is already
using index-only scans.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-08-19 20:55:18 | Re: "CLUSTER VERBOSE" tab completion |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-08-19 20:43:40 | Tab completion for DROP CONSTRAINT |