From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Ken Egervari" <ken(at)upfactor(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ragnar Hafstað <gnari(at)simnet(dot)is>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) |
Date: | 2005-03-02 20:29:30 |
Message-ID: | 13490.1109795370@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-performance |
"Ken Egervari" <ken(at)upfactor(dot)com> writes:
> Okay, here is the explain analyze I managed to get from work.
What platform is this on? It seems very strange/fishy that all the
actual-time values are exact integral milliseconds.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ken Egervari | 2005-03-02 20:38:16 | Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) |
PostgreSQL : Re :이 | Ken Egervari | 2005-03-02 20:06:58 | Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ken Egervari | 2005-03-02 20:38:16 | Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) |
PostgreSQL : Re :이 | Ken Egervari | 2005-03-02 20:06:58 | Re: Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) |