From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bad examples in pg_dump README |
Date: | 2013-01-08 03:12:22 |
Message-ID: | 1357614742.19347.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 15:34 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I propose slimming down the pg_dump README, keeping intact the
> > introductory notes and details of the tar format.
>
> Do we need to keep it at all, really? Certainly the introductory part
> is covered in the main documentation already...
I'd remove it and distribute the remaining information, if any, between
the source code and the man page.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-01-08 03:16:56 | Re: [PATCH] Patch to fix missing libecpg_compat.lib and libpgtypes.lib. |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-01-08 02:58:45 | PL/Python result object str handler |