| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" |
| Date: | 2001-07-30 04:24:14 |
| Message-ID: | 14887.996467054@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Actually, with this new code, we could go back to locking in oid order,
> which would eliminate the problem.
No it wouldn't. If anything, locking in a *randomized* order would be
the best bet. But I have no confidence in this approach, anyway.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-30 04:36:58 | Re: PostgreSQL7.1 on AIX5L is running with too poor ferformance |
| Previous Message | mlw | 2001-07-30 04:01:56 | Re: Re: From TODO, XML? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2001-07-30 06:24:09 | Patch to contrib/fulltextindex/fti.sql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-30 03:49:37 | Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" |