| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen(dot)wiedmann(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, dbi-users(at)perl(dot)org, perl(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions? |
| Date: | 2005-12-01 18:31:25 |
| Message-ID: | 15494.1133461885@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Where is Postgres at with psql using savepoints implicitly to wrap every
> client command btw?
I think that 8.1 psql can be told to do that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-01 18:35:08 | Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions? |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-12-01 18:24:20 | Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql |