| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fixing matching of boolean index columns to sort ordering |
| Date: | 2017-01-15 19:11:14 |
| Message-ID: | 15548.1484507474@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Bah. I was sure I was missing something, still I would have thought
> that the index scan is cheaper than the bitmap index scan with ORDER
> BY. As far as I can see, this patch is not the most elegant thing, but
> it has value. So marked as "ready for committer".
Pushed, thanks for the review.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2017-01-15 19:20:58 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-01-15 18:48:39 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |