| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
| Date: | 2001-06-14 01:40:55 |
| Message-ID: | 15803.992482855@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg범퍼카 토토SQL pgsql-patches |
"Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> writes:
>> Too late ;-). I just finished ripping out the unneeded parts and
>> applying.
> Thanks! I take it I still need to do the documentation though ;)
I put in a few words in func.sgml, but feel free to improve on it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergio Bruder | 2001-06-14 01:57:33 | corrupted document in 7.1.2 |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2001-06-14 01:37:00 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-14 02:52:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2001-06-14 01:37:00 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |