From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | prakashn(at)uci(dot)edu |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Relative ordering in array aggregation |
Date: | 2011-02-10 00:33:35 |
Message-ID: | 16259.1297298015@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
prakashn(at)uci(dot)edu writes:
> I'm using 8.3.3. I came across the array_accum aggregate function in
> the docs:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/xaggr.html
> This would be very useful to me, but I have a question about ordering
> of values. If I use more than one array_accum in the same select
> clause, is there any reliable correspondence between the order of
> elements in the returned arrays?
As long as you don't use DISTINCT (or, in more recent versions than 8.3,
within-aggregate ordering of the input rows), all aggregates in the same
SELECT list should receive the input rows in the same order.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Tolley | 2011-02-10 01:02:49 | Re: How to retrieve values of 'array' field using C library (libpq) |
Previous Message | Carlos Mennens | 2011-02-10 00:29:40 | Storing Media Types |