| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: hot update doesn't work? |
| Date: | 2010-05-12 16:02:52 |
| Message-ID: | 16376.1273680172@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> isn't it possible to skip the snapshot check for temp tables though?
No, it's no different from the regular-table case. There could be
snapshots that could see the older tuple versions --- consider
functions inside queries, etc.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-12 16:04:20 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-12 15:59:56 | Re: hot update doesn't work? |