| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| Date: | 2004-08-09 17:02:11 |
| Message-ID: | 16487.1092070931@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Oh. Then I have a different bug to report, because INITDB for Sunday's CVS
> would not run without the -L option.
Well, that does deserve investigation. But I've been initdb'ing
frequently and not noticed any problems. What configure switches
did you use exactly? Did you try to move the installation tree
after configure?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 17:11:01 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 16:57:33 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 17:11:01 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 16:57:33 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |