| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Improving backend startup interlock |
| Date: | 2002-10-04 02:45:51 |
| Message-ID: | 16666.1033699551@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Have people considered flock (advisory locking) on the postmaster.pid
> file for backend detection?
$ man flock
No manual entry for flock.
$
HPUX has generally taken the position of adopting both BSD and SysV
features, so if it doesn't exist here, it's not portable to older
Unixen ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-04 03:07:09 | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-04 02:29:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Anyone want to assist with the translation of |