From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2 |
Date: | 2006-03-03 01:33:42 |
Message-ID: | 16710.1141349622@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE seem to work fine in normal operation but there is an
> error with DELETE RETURNING when used through PL/pgSQL.
Probably other places too. I don't see any provision here for ensuring
that the variables used in the RETURNING list are actually computed by
the plan. This would be masked in the INSERT and non-join UPDATE cases
by the fact that the plan has to compute all columns of the target table
anyway ... but in a DELETE it'd be an issue.
I think set-returning functions in the RETURNING list might give you
some fits too ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-03-03 01:47:03 | Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-03 01:21:01 | Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2 |