| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, incheol yang <zoar(at)paran(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #1953: trigger action on delete |
| Date: | 2005-10-13 03:04:38 |
| Message-ID: | 16935.1129172678@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It isn't so much the alphabetical order, since there is only one
> trigger, but the concept that we now group all the _before_ triggers
> before the _after_ triggers.
But we've always done that. Has the example ever been correct?
I was intending to try it on older versions, but I don't actually
think it's ever acted like the docs said.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-13 03:20:20 | Re: BUG #1953: trigger action on delete |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-13 02:24:53 | Re: BUG #1953: trigger action on delete |