| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Another issue in default-values patch: defaults expanded too soon |
| Date: | 2008-12-16 23:28:07 |
| Message-ID: | 17403.1229470087@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Huh? Shouldn't changing a function which a view depends on require a
> rebuild of the view?
There is no such concept as "a rebuild of the view".
> That is, I think we should treat changing the defaults the same as we
> would changing the number and type of parameters; it kicks off a
> dependency check and requires a CASCADE.
Dream on ... there is no such facility in Postgres and we are not going
to build one in the 8.4 timeframe.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-16 23:38:17 | Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-12-16 23:04:56 | Re: Another issue in default-values patch: defaults expanded too soon |