| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit |
| Date: | 1999-07-04 13:55:44 |
| Message-ID: | 17907.931096544@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Can someone tell me what the maximum tuple length is?
I had always thought that the limit was supposed to be BLCKSZ less
overhead.
> Here is what I found with the new code. Seems it works.
> test=> vacuum;
> VACUUM
Wasn't the complaint that started this thread something about "peculiar
behavior" of VACUUM with big tuples? Might be wise to check VACUUM more
closely.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-04 14:18:30 | Re: [INTERFACES] Time and microseconds? |
| Previous Message | Herouth Maoz | 1999-07-04 10:10:17 | Re: [INTERFACES] Time and microseconds? |