| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Description of SIGHUP GUC parameters |
| Date: | 2006-02-08 23:49:35 |
| Message-ID: | 18181.1139442575@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Why not simply use the technical phrase: "SIGHUP" etc. We can just say
> 'these terms are shorthand for "......" '
> I'm not crazy about the terms but at least it is explicit and accurate.
> It would also allow us to have a much longer description of all of the
> implications and difficulties of each mode.
We have all that in the introductory section; the references made in the
per-variable descriptions really have no impact on how verbose the
introductory text is ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-14 04:03:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Online backup vs Continuous backup |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-02-08 22:17:56 | Re: Description of SIGHUP GUC parameters |