| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: orderRules() now a bad idea? |
| Date: | 2002-10-15 20:36:34 |
| Message-ID: | 18275.1034714194@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> But alphabetical? According to whose definition of the alphabet?
It looks like NAME comparison uses strcmp (actually strncmp). So it'll
be numeric byte-code order.
There's no particular reason we couldn't make that be strcoll instead,
I suppose, except perhaps speed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-15 20:42:18 | Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-15 20:13:02 | Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c |