From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David De Graff" <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.1.3 with source NAMEDATALEN change fails name regression |
Date: | 2001-11-27 15:06:04 |
Message-ID: | 18840.1006873564@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
"David De Graff" <postgresql(at)awarehouse(dot)com> writes:
> I then remembered the needed source code edit, wiped the installation and s=
> tarted afresh. The build went cleanly this time but the name regression tes=
> t failed. This isn't completely out of left field given the change, but I n=
> eed to know
> a) if it is a significant failure and
> b) if it should fail. If not, is this a bug in the source or the test?
I'd expect that; the regression test tests truncation of names, and
naturally it's set up for 32-byte names. You should be able to validate
the results by eyeball.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henry B. Hotz | 2001-11-30 19:57:56 | Darwin/MacOSX 10.1.1 configure issues with b3 |
Previous Message | David De Graff | 2001-11-27 08:02:48 | 7.1.3 with source NAMEDATALEN change fails name regression |