From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
Date: | 2001-06-09 22:18:33 |
Message-ID: | 19238.992125113@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
It's not approved yet ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-09 22:20:32 | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-09 22:15:54 | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-09 22:20:32 | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-09 22:15:54 | Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |