| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | pg_basebackup: Correct type of WalSegSz |
| Date: | 2023-03-30 06:24:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1bf15c7a-0acd-1864-081e-7a28814310fe@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The pg_basebackup code has WalSegSz as uint32, whereas the rest of the
code has it as int. This seems confusing, and using the extra range
wouldn't actually work. This was in the original commit (fc49e24fa6),
but I suppose it was an oversight.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-pg_basebackup-Correct-type-of-WalSegSz.patch | text/plain | 1.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2023-03-30 06:27:05 | Re: Doc: Rework contrib appendix -- informative titles, tweaked sentences |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-03-30 05:51:41 | Re: Simplify some codes in pgoutput |