| From: | Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean |
| Date: | 2016-02-12 16:51:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1fbd333a-6072-4d79-8608-62e228472cfa@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund wrote:
> Did you read what I wrote?
Read.
>That's not correct for char booleans, because the can have different bits set.
Current code support this behavior. But to shoot his leg becomes easier.
!= 0 much better of course.
Thanks.
--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2016-02-12 17:01:45 | Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-12 16:48:32 | Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean |