From: | Florent Guillaume <efge(at)mail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | UNION/INTERSECT in subselects |
Date: | 2000-08-31 17:50:45 |
Message-ID: | 20000831195045.A7426@twin.efge.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I'm using 7.0.2 and I have a problem with UNION in some subselects,
namely the following works:
select * from a where a.f in (select 1)
but this doesn't:
select * from a where a.f in (select 1 union select 2)
In the grammar we have :
in_expr: SubSelect | ...
but SubSelect doesn't allow UNIONs, only select_clause does.
Could in_expr be changed to use select_clause instead without adverse
ill effects ?
In fact SubSelect is used all over the place, so maybe it's better to
switch select_clause and SubSelect in the definitions for SelectStmt,
select_clause and SubSelect ?
Thanks,
Florent
(Please Cc: me in your answers)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-08-31 18:47:50 | Re: bitwise AND? |
Previous Message | Mark Hollomon | 2000-08-31 16:56:03 | new relkind for view |