From: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Bug #511: multiple foreign keys on same table fail update cascade |
Date: | 2001-11-07 18:27:43 |
Message-ID: | 200111071827.fA7IRhU16629@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Paul Wehr (postgresql(at)industrialsoftworks(dot)com) reports a bug with a severity of 2
The lower the number the more severe it is.
Short Description
multiple foreign keys on same table fail update cascade
Long Description
I would expect the code below to say "1 records updated", setting the values of t_b.b and t_b.c to "2".
Sample Code
create table t_a (a int, primary key (a));
create table t_b (b int, c int,
foreign key (b) references t_a (a) on update cascade,
foreign key (c) references t_a (a) on update cascade);
insert into t_a values (1);
insert into t_b values (1, 1);
update t_a set a=2;
No file was uploaded with this report
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vincent.Gaboriau | 2001-11-08 14:44:16 | Curious problem with the character û é |
Previous Message | Kovacs Zoltan | 2001-11-06 21:35:17 | Re: Bug #510: conditional rules sometimes work more than |