| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hal Davison <hal(at)faams(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Nicolas Bazin <nbazin(at)ingenico(dot)com(dot)au>, Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ecpg weird behavior |
| Date: | 2002-03-20 20:05:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20020320200514.GB14143@feivel.fam-meskes.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 07:39:27PM -0500, Hal Davison wrote:
> Why is an ARRAY type not supported by SQL as a columnar definition as an
> extension to each data element?
Sorry, I didn't exactly understand what you mean. Where do you want to
use an array?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2002-03-20 20:17:34 | Re: ecpg weird behavior |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2002-03-20 20:03:51 | Re: ecpg weird behavior |