| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Date: | 2002-08-02 16:28:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20020802132759.H83339-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:39:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Actually, plpgsql is pretty expensive too. The thing to be benchmarking
> > is applications of plain old built-in-C functions and operators.
>
> I thought part of the justification for this was for the OpenACS
> guys; don't they write everything in TCL?
Nope, the OpenACS stuff relies on plpgsql functions ... the 'TCL' is the
web pages themselves, vs using something like PHP ... I may be wrong, but
I do not believe any of the functions are in TCL ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Wickstrom | 2002-08-02 16:35:10 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Previous Message | J. R. Nield | 2002-08-02 16:26:52 | Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations |