From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, Roland Roberts <roland(at)astrofoto(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
Date: | 2002-09-29 20:47:49 |
Message-ID: | 200209291347.49207.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg메이저 토토 사이트SQL pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Bruce,
> If we change CURRENT_TIMESTAMP to statement time, I don't think we need
> now(""), but if we don't change it, I think we do --- somehow we should
> allow users to access statement time.
I'd argue that we need the 3 kinds of now() regardless, just to limit user
confusion. If we set things up as:
now() = transaction time
current_timestamp = statement time
timeofday() = exact time
That does give users access to all 3 timestamps, but using a competely
non-intuitive nomenclature. It's likely that the three types of now() would
just be pointers to other time functions, but would provide nomenative
clarity.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-29 21:27:58 | Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-29 20:38:37 | Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-29 21:27:58 | Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-29 20:38:37 | Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-29 21:27:58 | Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-29 20:38:37 | Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |