| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [JDBC] Patch for handling "autocommit=false" |
| Date: | 2002-10-11 05:17:02 |
| Message-ID: | 200210110517.g9B5H2w25526@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Barry Lind wrote:
> Did anything come of this discussion on whether SET initiates a
> transaction or not?
SET does not start a multi-statement transaction when autocommit is off.
> In summary what is the right way to deal with setting autocommit in clients?
I guess just 'set autocommit to on' will do it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mario Weilguni | 2002-10-11 07:14:50 | number of attributes in page files? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-11 04:10:42 | Re: Diff for src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c between version |