| From: | markw(at)osdl(dot)org |
|---|---|
| To: | gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, osdldbt-general(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: More Prelimiary DBT-2 Test Results with PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2003-10-06 19:15:53 |
| Message-ID: | 200310061915.h96JFu113017@mail.osdl.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 Sep, Greg Stark wrote:
> Ok, I guess I misunderstood you. These queries are taking 0.5ms - 300ms except
> for the last aggregate query which takes just over 1s.
http://developer.osdl.org/markw/dbt2-pgsql/120/
I have more data where I got the response times for each transaction
much lower by increasing shared_buffers and wal_buffers. I wanted to
let everyone know in case someone wanted to take another look. I'm
working on increasing the database size to drive the system harder.
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-10-06 19:17:18 | Re: Open 7.4 items |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-06 19:05:53 | Re: db encoding |