| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Advice regarding configuration parameters |
| Date: | 2004-02-09 09:19:51 |
| Message-ID: | 200402091019.51990.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg범퍼카 토토SQL |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Given all the work Peter put into GUC (for very good reasons), I was
> a tad astonished to read him proposing to develop a non-GUC mechanism
> for configuring PLs.
I for one was a tad astonished to read that there is already support for
adding variables at run-time, given that we previously rejected that
notion. But the "namespace" idea for variables added by external
modules sounds interesting.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-02-09 09:23:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Linking the previously separated documentation |
| Previous Message | Darius | 2004-02-09 08:58:04 | Please help re function packaging... |