| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pl/Java - next step? |
| Date: | 2004-02-23 16:14:09 |
| Message-ID: | 200402231714.09095.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> 1. Select Pl/Java_JNI.
> 2. Select Pl/Java_remote
> 3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics
> 4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes
> (controversial? Nah :-) )
Option 5 (or 0) would be to use GCJ. This is likely to be the fastest
and most lightweight solution, but perhaps not the most featureful.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-02-23 17:32:39 | Re: Pl/Java - next step? |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-02-23 15:57:40 | Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it required? |