| From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance |
| Date: | 2004-02-27 12:35:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20040227073459.M31900@xeon.unixathome.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Chris,
>
> > Claims of "conformance" are a bit specious when there isn't much of a
> > standards body on this anymore. And vendors that consider themselves
> > commercially important are quite prepared to ignore standards whenever
> > it seems convenient.
>
> Yeah, why do you think they disbanded the compliance team in the first place?
> Just ask Joe Celko ....
I haven't spoken with Joe in years.. why don't you tell us?
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-02-27 14:29:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Troels Arvin | 2004-02-27 08:53:45 | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance |