| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it |
| Date: | 2004-03-07 14:58:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20040307145847.GB22118@1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:40:40PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Is this fine?
> * Allow a 'connection *' pointer to be specified instead of a string to
> denote a connection.
> ...
I personally have no problem with this as long as it does not break
compatibility to the code we allow now.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-03-07 15:28:59 | Re: Slony-I makes progress |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2004-03-07 14:46:52 | Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it |